Skip to main content

MODELLING

Modelling of a shape derives from its physical form, whether round,
square or otherwise, coupled with the way in which light plays on its
surfaces. This is referred to as its modelling and when this derives from
daylight or sunlight, giving light from a single direction, this provides a
form which is perceived by the eye as having meaning, unambiguous.
This is a different experience again from the form of an object or space
resulting from a room lit by artificial light, where the overall light may be
received from a multitude of light sources.
The most usual daylight modelling is that derived from vertical
windows at the side of a room, giving light from a single direction; this
may be helped by windows from an adjacent wall which adds to the
modelling; as the light will still be from the same overall direction, but
adding to the total modelling.
Two examples might be used to emphasize this, the first, a Greek Doric
column where the light of day gives modelling to the entasis on the
rounded surfaces of the column; light which emphasizes its particular
rounded quality together with its verticality. The second example is the
original David statue by Michelangelo seen in its setting in the art gallery
in Florence, lit from daylight above, where the form changes in time as
the day goes by.

A more modern example of the use of overhead daylight to light a
statue is the Charioteer in Delphi (Case Study pp. 170–171).
Daylight by its nature gives meaning and aids our understanding of a
shape or space by its directional flow; a meaning which is emphasized
even further by the addition of direct sunlight.
Interior spaces are judged to be pleasant, bright or gloomy as a result of
the effects of modelling and interiors are judged by the way in which the
spaces and the objects within them are seen during the day to be natural,
or accord to our experience of the natural world.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Architectural History of Ahmadabad City

Hello Friends ,  We have created a Youtube Chaneel of Architectural world , Where we will be sharing Architectural Presentations of Famous Architects ,  there works and History . We will be also sharing presentations of Numerous building as well as Architectural styles .  Today we have added presentation of  Architectural History of  Ahmadabad  City  , Please check the video and Subscribe to our Architectural Knowledge channel for more valuable videos.

CONTEMPORARY CITY FOR THREE MILLION INHABITANTS

Urban design by Le Corbusier, 1922 Exhibited in 1922 at the Salon d’Automne in Paris, the Contem-porary City for Three Million Inhabitants was Le Corbusier’s first comprehensive urban-planning project. Accompanied by a 100-square-meter diorama, it consisted of a rigidly geometric, centralized orthogonal plan with monumental axes, uniform modern buildings, vast expanses of open space covering 85 to 95 percent of the surface, and a system of highways. The project was seen simultaneously as a breathtaking modern vision and as the destruction of the familiar urban setting. Influence on the project ranged from American gridded cities, Peter Behrens’ work, and Tony Garnier’s Une Cité industrielle (1901–04, 1917; An Industrial Town) to Bruno Taut’s Utopian Die Stadtkrone (1919; The City Crown). By 1922 Le Corbusier was one of the major figures of the Modern movement, and the Contemporary City marked a high point in a period of extraordinary activity. It incorporated two ideas that he had been...

DOM-INO HOUSES

Housing design by Le Corbusier, 1914–15 and later Between 1914 and 1915, Le Corbusier, partly encouraged by his friend Max du Bois, conceived of a standardized system of construction using reinforced concrete, which was to provide the structural basis of most of his houses through the mid-1930s. These were the Dom-ino prefabricated houses with independent skeletons. The frame was to be completely independent of the floor plans of the houses. Derived from the Hennebique frame, it consisted of six thin concrete columns that simply carried two horizontal slabs as the floors. The columns and slabs were connected by staircases. Apart from this structural core of the houses, nothing else was fixed, thus permitting a great flexibility to suit demands on the basis of aesthetics, climate, composition, or view. The floor plan was also extremely flexible, as interior partitions were independent of the grid. This utterly simple and clear “open plan” method did away with load-carrying walls. Suppor...